Cases of Interest

Plaintiffs’ late disclosure of expert witness information was not so unreasonable as to justify exclusion of their expert testimony at trial.

The full range of fees that respondent hospital charged or accepted as payment for medical services rendered is relevant in determining the reasonable and customary value of such services.

Defendant was allowed to amend her pleading absent a showing of prejudice to plaintiff; agricultural activity alleged to be a nuisance must be defined before analysis of the Right to Farm Act can be applied.

Mental health patient may pursue tort claims against the Department of State Hospitals despite failing to include the required filing fee because he did not receive notice of his claim deficiency.

The Fifth Circuit improperly finds police immunity on summary judgment by failing to consider evidence in favor of plaintiff’s excessive force claim.