Since summary judgement motion was electronically filed and served 107 days or more before trial, it was timely, and the moving parties were entitled to a hearing on the motion.
The availability of remote trial testimony is not a proper basis for denying a motion to transfer a case to the county where most witnesses are located.
In a statute-of-limitations dispute, there was a triable issue of fact as to when an attorney’s representation ended when he sent equivocal emails regarding his intent to withdraw and signed subsequent documents that identified him as the client’s representation.