Cases of Interest

Trial court prejudicially erred when it omitted ‘Privette and Hooker’ doctrine limitations from its instructions on negligence and premises liability.

The trial court did not err in denying a post-judgment motion to compel and sanctions were proper.

Trial court’s failure to highlight one factor of the integrated enterprise test was harmless error because substantial evidence supported all factors of test.

“Going and coming rule” under respondeat superior theory prevented employer from being vicariously liable when employee hit and killed pedestrian while driving to work in his personal vehicle

Defendants’ staging of a racing event created a triable issue of material fact because a reasonable jury could find that the staging created a risk beyond the inherent risks of the sport.