Cases of Interest

The case involved claims of strict products liability and negligence against Daimler Trucks following the death of the plaintiffs’ mother, Ortiz. She was killed when a commercial truck traveling over 55 miles per hour rear-ended her car at a red light. Raising design defect and negligent design claims, the plaintiffs alleged that Daimler Trucks should be held liable for their mother’s death because it failed to equip the truck with a collision avoidance system. That system warns drivers when it detects a collision risk with a stationary object, including stopped traffic, and can automatically stop the truck when the driver fails to act. Daimler Trucks manufactured that system, but not all trucks were equipped with it.

The court of appeals ruled that the trial court’s decision was erroneous and held that more information needed to be disclosed. Now, the trial court needs to have further proceedings to determine how much more disclosure is required.

The case originates from a lawsuit filed against petitioners, who own and operate Bermuda Dunes Airport, by RPI’s owners of adjacent land, who seek to impose an easement across the airport property. The trial was originally set for May 2, 2025. On November 14, 2024, petitioners reserved an April 1, 2025, hearing date for their MSJ through the Riverside Court Reservation System. The motion was filed and served on RPI’s via email on January 10, 2025, 81 days before the hearing date and more than 30 days before trial, pursuant to statute. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (a)(2).)

The goal of California’s statutory scheme governing presentation of evidence in the case-in-chief “is to avoid surprise at trial. (Staub v. Kiley (2014) 226 Cal.App.4th 1437, 1444, 1447, 173 Cal.Rptr.3d 104 (Staub); see also Deyo v. Kilbourne (1978) 84 Cal.App.3d 771, 781, 149 Cal.Rptr. 499 (Deyo) [“discovery laws were designed to prevent trial by ambush”].)

Where the evidence shows that the plaintiff’s negligence was the sole proximate cause of an injury, comparative negligence need not be submitted to the jury.