Cases of Interest

Trial court erred in interpreting Wage Order No 16, section 5(D) as permitting employees and employers to enter CBA’s that waived right to all compensation for employer-mandated travel time.

“Ordinary consumer expectations” test not applicable where expert testimony will be essential to assist jury in understanding pros and cons of plaintiff’s arguments.

In order to grant summary judgement, the moving party must meet their burden of proof and address all causes of action in their separate statement

The Court found that a father providing financial support to his adult son was not liable for the death of the son’s girlfriend due to an overdose of drugs supplied by the son. 5 7

Where an employer requires employees to undergo mandatory exit searches of bags and technology devices brought to work purely for personal convenience, this time is compensable.