Cases of Interest

Policy language was sufficient to aggregate spouse’s damages for loss of consortium with damages for bodily injury to injured spouse.

A trial court erred in failing to award damages for the costs of providing home health services to decedent where he was cared for at home.

Motion for summary judgment is proper when there is no evidence that there was a foreign substance on the floor at time customer fell or evidence the store was on constructive notice.

Trial court properly precluded expert testimony on causation where it is too speculative to the jury.

An “at will” provision in an employment contract does not mean an employer can’t avoid tort liability for fraudulent inducement of contract based on the contract’s inclusion of said provision.